No to eye!

Eots too random aswell, the one winning the inital light duell wins 90% of the games.

What? That's more likely to happen in Craters (where the head spells are ridiculously powerful) than EOTS lol..

rofll Ragnj, have you ever played eye of the storm? Sure first lightning duel important but by NO MEANS will it usually end a game and decide the game compared to face off. Before the lightning duel, most pros on eots make a tower defense, have firewarriors ready, so even an earthquake won't do damage. Most pros also have warriors in case the enemy has a warrrior rush planned. Eye of the storm is epic..

Ive probably played eots more then you Keith. Ive never seen someone have a decent tower deffence up before one gets lb on eots wich is usually all they get before attacking (and maybe a light in rare cases), doesnt happen. You probably played noobs.

People don't play EOTS enough for it to be used in the tournament

i prefer tot!

(11-17-2009 07:34 AM)Ragnj Wrote:  Ive probably played eots more then you Keith. Ive never seen someone have a decent tower deffence up before one gets lb on eots wich is usually all they get before attacking (and maybe a light in rare cases), doesnt happen. You probably played noobs.

We should play sometime.



And yeah Sub: You're right, I guess I didn't take that into account.

I'd vote for tot, since I think face off isn't a good 1 vs 1 map, but w/e I'll play what I'm given.

Rofl, leaning towards TOT (1 tele only) atm if noone can come on here and speak for FO.

Na, play FO instead, it's much better than TOT

Play FO otherwise it's a FARSE

err, speak constructive*

Level 1v1's in fo (eg last round) are always intense. Level skill means more battling for hill, more strategy required than TOT.

I'd vote for eye of the storm, it looks more fair to me than FO. If both players are experienced enough the first light duell wouldnt decide the game.. The downpart of Eots is the hosting part. Some people will lag or aren't able to host.