Fo could be the most hated 1 v1 map ever due the 'random' factor.
ToT is a decent 1 v 1 map if you just turn either convert off or if your not praying, then its quite even.
I think we should replace Fo with ToT,

discuss

I wanna play fo

Its up to the peaople, Im ok with changing fo to tot if thats what most wants.

TOT red vs yell is very even and tele is not a very powerfull spell imo.

Add to that that FOs not such a great map for 1on1s.

Yah I agree. Two on two much more epic of a fight and face off just doesn't have the epic-ness.

Na the typical top 3 maps are PP, CR and FO. Do those imo.

(11-15-2009 09:14 PM)AlaN_90 Wrote:  Na the typical top 3 maps are PP, CR and FO. Do those imo.

+1

But fo's so sheit. :|


At least yeh can backdoor in two on two if someone camps on middle. And I will just firewarrior rape anyone who sidedoors me if I grab hill on face off. It's just 100% win if you get hill usually.

Get hill first then duh

(11-15-2009 09:14 PM)AlaN_90 Wrote:  Na the typical top 3 maps are PP, CR and FO. Do those imo.

In 2on2s yes, not in 1on1s.

One thoght is to scrap a third map and only do cr and pp, but Id say thats pretty boring?

I've played more 1v1's on FO than on ToT.

Stupid idea. It worked perfectly fine last time with FO

Saying FO isn't a 1v1 level is stupid, it's exactly the same as playing 2v2. You fight for the hill because hill = advantage

Face off is just dumb though. But I will withdraw my opinion!

Id say Fo is more random then TOT tho, but maybe thats just me.

I think FO yellow vs red is more fairer than it is on TOT

Or maybe yellow vs green?